Daniel and the Revelation - 1897
Published by Campbell M Gold in Religion · Saturday 19 Jul 2025 · 3:00
Tags: Daniel, Revelation, 1897, Scripture, Bible, study, prophecy
Tags: Daniel, Revelation, 1897, Scripture, Bible, study, prophecy
Daniel and the Revelation
Daniel and the Revelation - 1897
(Uriah Smith)
The books of Daniel and Revelation are counterparts of each other. They naturally stand side by side and should be studied together.
We are aware that any attempt to explain these books and apply their prophecies is generally looked upon as a futile and fanatical task, and is sometimes met with open hostility. It is much to be regretted that any portions of that volume which all Christians believe to be the book wherein God has undertaken to reveal his will to mankind, should come to be regarded in such a light. But a significant fact, to which the reader’s attention is called in the following paragraph, is believed to contain for this state of things both an explanation and an antidote.
There are two general systems of interpretation adopted by different expositors in their efforts to explain the sacred Scriptures. The first is the mystical or spiritualizing system invented by Origen, to the shame of sound criticism and the curse of Christendom; the second is the system of literal interpretation, used by such men as Tyndale, Luther, and all the Reformers, and furnishing the basis for every advance step which has thus far been made in the reformation from error to truth as taught in the Scriptures. According to the first system, every declaration is supposed to have a mystical or hidden sense, which it is the province of the interpreter to bring forth; by the second, every declaration is to be taken in its most obvious and literal sense, except where the context and the well-known laws of language show that the terms are figurative, and not literal; and whatever is figurative must be explained by other portions of the Bible which are literal.
By the mystical method of Origen, it is vain to hope for any uniform understanding of either Daniel or the Revelation, or of any other book of the Bible; for that system (if it can be called a system) knows no law but the uncurbed imagination of its adherents; hence there are on its side as many different interpretations of Scripture as there are different fancies of other writers.
By the literal method, everything is subject to well-established and clearly-defined law; and, viewed from this standpoint, the reader will be surprised to see how simple, easy, and clear many portions of the Scriptures at once become, which, according to any other system, are dark and unsolvable. It is admitted that many figures are used in the Bible, and that much of the books under consideration, especially that of the Revelation, are clothed in symbolic language. Still, it is also claimed that the Scriptures introduce no figure that they do not somewhere furnish with literal language to explain.
This volume is presented as a consistent exposition of the books of Daniel and Revelation, based on the literal system.
There are no reviews yet.

