Insanity - Geoengineers Plan to Modify the Atmosphere by Releasing Toxic Sulphur
Published by Campbell M Gold in Blowing in the Wind · Sunday 04 May 2025 · 4:30
Tags: Insanity, Geoengineering, Atmosphere, Toxic, Sulphur, Acid, Rain, Global, Warming, Boeing, 777, Sulphur, Dioxide, Stratosphere, Environmental, Controversy
Tags: Insanity, Geoengineering, Atmosphere, Toxic, Sulphur, Acid, Rain, Global, Warming, Boeing, 777, Sulphur, Dioxide, Stratosphere, Environmental, Controversy
Acid Rain Catastrophe
Geoengineers Plan to Modify the Atmosphere by Releasing Toxic Sulphur - A Potential Acid Rain Catastrophe... Bad... Very, very bad...
Insanity
In an insane, controversial effort to combat global warming, scientists propose retrofitting fleets of Boeing 777s to spray large quantities of sulphur dioxide into the stratosphere. This approach could lead to acid rain on a global scale. Alarmingly, this method would require three times more toxic aerosols than alternative high-altitude solutions, increasing the risks to human health and vulnerable ecosystems.
Even more concerning, researchers openly acknowledge that this scheme would significantly increase side effects, such as widespread environmental damage. Despite these warnings, powerful interests are pressing ahead with the plan. Behind closed doors, global elites are fast-tracking these radical geoengineering experiments, branding them as "climate intervention," while bypassing democratic discussion and neglecting the potential for irreversible harm. Are we simply trading one catastrophe for another?
Key Points
- Scientists propose retrofitting Boeing 777s to spray sulphur dioxide into the stratosphere, risking acid rain and environmental devastation.
- The plan requires three times more toxic aerosol than high-altitude methods, increasing health and ecological hazards.
- Researchers admit the scheme would "strongly increase side-effects such as acid rain"—yet push forward anyway.
- Global elites are fast-tracking geoengineering under the guise of "climate intervention," bypassing public scrutiny - this is a new cash-cow.
An Insane gamble with the planet
In an insane move that challenges both science and common sense, geoengineers are now advocating for the use of commercial airliners in a radical experiment aimed at altering the Earth’s climate. A new study published in Earth’s Future reveals plans to modify Boeing 777 aircraft to release millions of tons of sulphur dioxide into the lower stratosphere. This initiative could lead to catastrophic acid rain, harm ecosystems, and accelerate the environmental collapse it ostensibly seeks to prevent.
The study, conducted by University College London and Yale researchers, acknowledges that the plan would "strongly increase side effects such as acid rain" due to the massive amounts of sulphur needed. Unlike high-altitude aerosol injection (SAI), which requires specialised aircraft, this approach utilises existing aircraft flying at just 42,000 feet. This lower altitude allows the toxic particles to descend more quickly and in larger concentrations.
The irony is madness - to "save" the planet from climate change, they are willing to inundate it with poison.
A blueprint for disaster
The authors acknowledge that their low-altitude sulphur-dumping strategy is "suboptimal", indicating it is less effective, more hazardous, and disproportionately impacts polar regions. Nonetheless, they support it, citing "lower technical barriers" and the ability to deploy quicker.
Principal Dangers
- Acid rain devastation: Sulphur dioxide reacts with water vapour to form sulfuric acid, which destroys forests, contaminates water supplies, and erodes infrastructure.
- Human health risks: Increased exposure to particulate matter is linked to respiratory diseases, heart conditions, and premature death.
- Unilateral deployment: The study warns of a "greater risk of unilateral deployment," which means rogue nations or corporations could hijack the skies without global oversight.
This isn’t science. It’s a corporate-military power grab disguised as environmentalism.
History Repeats Itself - From Cloud Seeding to Sky Poisoning
The push for geoengineering is not a new concept. For decades, global elites have manipulated weather patterns under the pretence of "environmental stewardship." In the 20th century, cloud seeding was used to influence rainfall. The focus has shifted to stratospheric aerosol injection—a much more dangerous approach.
One study compares the sulphur output from this method to that of the 1991 Mount Pinatubo eruption, which temporarily cooled the planet but also resulted in widespread acid rain and ozone depletion. However, unlike a natural disaster, geoengineering would create a permanent and artificial atmospheric condition that, once initiated, could not be easily stopped without causing "termination shock"—a sudden and catastrophic spike in global warming.
Who Profits?
The geoengineering-industrial complex is already positioning itself for massive taxpayer-funded contracts. Britain’s ARIA agency is getting ready to conduct field experiments, while defence contractors and aerospace giants like Boeing stand to profit from retrofitting their fleets. Meanwhile, the public remains uninformed, and consent is not obtained. This situation is a silent coup of greed against the very skies.
A crime against nature
This isn't about saving the planet but managing our dependence on a toxic and irreversible atmospheric intervention. The same corporate and governmental forces that harmed the environment with industrialisation are now attempting to "fix" it by dispersing sulfur into the skies.
As the study acknowledges, this plan is flawed, dangerous, and inefficient—yet it is being fast-tracked regardless. The real question isn't whether it is possible to implement this plan; the question is: Will we allow them to do it, or will the government introduce new state laws to combat geoengineering?
01 May 2025
Sources
- JonFleetwood.substack.com
- AGUPubs.wiley.com
- Enoch, Brighteon.ai
There you have it... Very concerning... What do you think...
There are no reviews yet.