The Absurd Reality of Starmer’s Broken Britain
Published by Campbell M Gold in Blowing in the Wind · Wednesday 30 Apr 2025 · 7:30
Tags: Starmer, Broken, Britain, human, trafficking, illegal, immigrants, scandal, collaboration, politics, UK, news
Tags: Starmer, Broken, Britain, human, trafficking, illegal, immigrants, scandal, collaboration, politics, UK, news
The Absurd Reality of Starmer’s Broken Britain
See what's just blown in...
Jan to Apr 2025, nearly 10,000 Illegal Migrants have entered Britain by Boat
Starmer’s not smashing the human trafficking gangs – he’s going into business with them.
Keir Starmer isn’t "smashing the gangs" that are breaking laws and flooding Britain with illegal immigrants; instead, he seems to be collaborating with them.
That’s the conclusion one draws from the latest shocking scandal in broken Britain.
Amid the country’s broken borders, a rising number of illegal immigrants, and diminishing public trust in the political class’s ability to address this crisis, something deeply troubling has come to light.
The British government is using taxpayers’ money to offer significantly more favourable contracts to private landlords who rent their properties to asylum seekers and illegal migrants, rather than to British citizens who need housing.
This situation is unbelievable but true!
With support from the British government, private companies like Serco are now boasting about offering landlords enticing five-year deals to encourage them to house 30,000 asylum seekers and illegal migrants, at the expense of hardworking, tax-paying British people.
Unlike the normal housing market, these deals come with guarantees. Landlords are offered leases with no risk of arrears or non-payment, funding for property repairs and council tax bills, and no fees for letting companies or property managers.
In essence, landlords are being provided with significant incentives to house those who are breaking our laws. Meanwhile, these migrants are being enticed with even more reasons to enter Britain in the first place—the promise of their own homes.
As noted by many commentators, the more incentives Starmer provides to illegal migrants, the more will arrive.
Instead of promoting Britain as a destination for holidaymakers to spend their money, he appears to be marketing it as a haven for illegal immigrants to come and live off taxpayer support.
Today, the British people find themselves in the absurd position of having their own money used by the British state to outbid them in the private housing market, prioritising individuals who break the law over citizens.
This situation is neither right nor fair, and it is certainly not what the vast majority of people in Britain want or voted for.
It exemplifies the shocking unfairness that characterises Starmer's Britain—a country where everyone except the British majority seems to take precedence.
In recent years, British workers, families, and young people have been squeezed out of an increasingly competitive housing market, partly because mass immigration has driven house prices and rents.
Furthermore, when we examine social housing, we find that a significant portion—nearly half in London and over 60 per cent in major cities like Birmingham—is allocated to people not even born in Britain.
Now, amid a worsening border crisis, the ruling class and the state seem to be deliberately worsening the situation and fuelling this sense of unfairness by providing a large amount of private housing to individuals who are openly violating our laws.
It would be like placing a bright, flashing neon sign on the white cliffs of Dover that reads: "Free housing for illegal migrants," because that is essentially what is happening in Labour’s Britain.
While Keir Starmer and Yvette Cooper claim to be "smashing the gangs," the reality is that they are strengthening the very business model that supports those gangs.
The Labour government has scrapped the Rwanda plan, Britain's only serious deterrent against illegal migration. Unfortunately, Labour couldn’t wait to see if it would have an effect before deciding to overturn it.
Labour decriminalised illegal migration into Britain by overturning the Illegal Migration Act. This move removed age checks and made it easier for individuals to stay in the country once they arrived.
At the same time, while maintaining one of the most generous welfare systems for illegal migrants in Europe, Labour has approved the vast majority of asylum claims. This creates an incentive for smuggler gangs and migrants to keep coming, as they know they have a strong chance of being allowed to stay in Britain indefinitely if they arrive.
Additionally, TikTok, YouTube, and other Social Media videos showcasing the apartments and houses available to migrants are widely shared, reaching viewers from Syria to Iraq and Afghanistan to Eritrea. While some may laugh at our situation, many more will be encouraged to come to our so-called land of milk, honey, and first-class accommodation. We must be cautious about these developments!
Instead of establishing a deterrent, Keir Starmer, Yvette Cooper, and the Labour government are creating further incentives for illegal immigration. Since Labour returned to power, the number of small boats arriving in Britain has surged to record levels.
Jan to Apr 2025, nearly 10,000 Illegal Migrants have entered Britain by Boat
So far this year, Jan to Apr 2025, nearly 10,000 illegal migrants have entered Britain by boat, which is an increase of over 40% compared to the same time last year and more than 80% compared to 2023. And we haven’t even reached the warm summer months yet.
According to the latest data, around 38,000 asylum seekers are in hotels, up from 29,000 before last year’s general election. This number will increase even more as the Labour government struggles with the border crisis.
However, this is not the most pressing concern. The genuine problem is that Starmer and Labour are fostering something much darker and more sinister in our country that could have far-reaching and profoundly adverse effects.
This issue is tied to the importance of the "social contract"—the critical yet delicate relationship between the people and their rulers. In this relationship, citizens voluntarily surrender some of their rights and freedoms to the state in exchange for protection and the benefits of living in a well-organised, safe, and prosperous society.
Now is the time to ask: What kind of protection is offered by a ruling class and a state that prioritises foreigners and lawbreakers over its citizens when it comes to distributing the limited housing resources in this country?
Moreover, what does it say about our society when it not only welcomes but rewards those who break the law, while showing total contempt for hard-working, law-abiding citizens? This situation leaves British taxpayers facing a bill of over £2 billion annually for these hotel and accommodation costs alone.
Finally, we must question why we should voluntarily surrender our rights and freedoms to a political elite and a disconnected state bureaucracy that appears indifferent, if not openly hostile, to its people, who are treated as second-class citizens in their own country.
It's not just that while Labour promised to tackle the gangs, they are now collaborating with them; Starmer's Labour is rapidly undermining the foundational social contract that has long held Britain together.
Millions of people, having witnessed the mismanagement of borders by leaders from both the left and right for decades, have started to lose trust and faith in the system.
Many ordinary citizens will live near "houses for multiple occupancy" in the weeks, months, and years ahead. They will no longer feel secure in the neighbourhoods they once knew.
Members of the elite class won't have to endure this situation. They are not the ones facing long waiting lists for social housing, competing with dozens of others for the same rental apartment, or being squeezed out of home ownership.
As usual, the hardworking, tax-paying, law-abiding majority will bear the burden of the disastrous policies pursued by the self-serving elite. These elites support the idea of open borders as long as they do not have to deal with the consequences themselves.
More than anything, the social contract's dramatic weakening-or even looming collapse—should concern everyone.
As this scandal unfolds, and as we look at Westminster, we see a ruling class uninterested in maintaining or strengthening the social contract with the people who elected them to serve. If the verdict elite genuinely cared about the British people, they would not subject them to this disastrous reality.
We British have indeed become strangers in our own land!
29/04/2025
Source
The Expose
There are no reviews yet.