Vladimir Putin Bans All GM Food & Animals

Go to content

Vladimir Putin Bans All GM Food & Animals

Campbell M Gold.com
Vladimir Putin Bans GM Food & Animals
 
This has just blown in...

Through Russia's State Duma, Vladimir Putin recently implemented a sweeping ban on cultivating and breeding genetically modified (GM) plants and animals in the country, except for scientific research.

The aim is to eradicate GMOs from Russia's agricultural sector. While this decision has sparked global debates, it is crucial to examine the facts surrounding the ban, explore potential benefits, and understand the concerns related to genetically modified organisms (GMOs).

Key Facts:

The ban encompasses both plants and animals, extending beyond cultivation to completely prohibit breeding of genetically modified organisms. This means that GMOs cannot reproduce naturally within Russia. The ban allows for the use of GMOs in scientific research aimed at advancing knowledge and understanding, rather than for commercial purposes.

Benefits of the Ban

  1. Environmental Considerations: Supporters of the ban argue that it could help preserve biodiversity by preventing the potential spread of genetically modified organisms into natural ecosystems. They believe that by excluding GMOs from agriculture, Russia can maintain the integrity of its diverse flora and fauna.

  2. Food Safety and Consumer Health: Proponents of the ban assert that it safeguards consumers' well-being. They argue that GMOs may have unpredictable long-term effects on human health. By prohibiting their cultivation and breeding, Russia aims to prioritize the precautionary principle.

Concerns Surrounding GMOs

  1. Environmental Impact: Critics of GMOs express concerns about their potential environmental impact. They argue that genetically modified crops could lead to unintended consequences, such as the development of herbicide-resistant weeds or harm to non-target organisms.

  2. Health Considerations: Opponents of GMOs raise concerns regarding genetically modified foods' potential allergenicity or toxicity. They argue that introducing foreign genes into crops could have unforeseen effects on human health, necessitating rigorous, long-term safety assessments.

  3. Socio-Economic Factors: Some critics highlight biotechnology corporations' potential monopolisation of the agricultural industry. They argue that GMOs often involve patented seeds, making farmers dependent on purchasing new seeds every season. This can create economic inequalities and limit farmers' autonomy.
  
Russia's State Duma's decision to impose a comprehensive ban on the cultivation and breeding of GMOs, with the exception of scientific research, is a significant move towards establishing a GMO-free agricultural system.

Proponents highlight the potential benefits for environmental conservation and consumer health, while opponents express concerns about the ecological impact of genetically modified organisms, as well as health and socio-economic implications. And don't forget there is mega-money to be mad by the Pharmaceutical Elite.

As the ban comes into effect, it will be important to monitor the outcomes, analyse scientific research findings, and engage in informed discussions to assess the long-term effects of GMOs and the potential consequences of the ban on Russia's agricultural sector and society.

13th June 2023

End

Source:
teslatelegraph.com




There are no reviews yet.
0
0
0
0
0
Enter your rating:
Back to content